Baudier, P., Kondrateva, G., Ammi, C., Chang, V. & Schiavone, F. Digital transformation of healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: patients’ teleconsultation acceptance and trusting beliefs. Technovation 120, 102547 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bengtson, A., Morici, B. C. & Lindholm, C. Becoming a public sector insider-A case study of Swedish digital healthcare start-ups entrepreneurial business formation processes. Ind. Mark. Manage. 105, 340–350 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kraus, S., Schiavone, F., Pluzhnikova, A. & Invernizzi, A. C. Digital transformation in healthcare: analyzing the current state-of-research. J. Bus. Res. 123, 557–567 (2021).
Google Scholar
Albert-Cromarias, A. Dos santos, C. Coopetition in healthcare: heresy or reality? An exploration of felt outcomes at an intra-organizational level. Soc. Sci. Med. 252, 112938 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gu, W. et al. Evaluation of Chinese healthcare organizations’ innovative performance in the digital health era. Front. Public. Health. 11, 1141757 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sun, R., Li, S. & Liu, W. A congruence perspective on how human and social capital affect learning capability and innovation. PloS One. 15, e0231504 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chakraborty, I., Edirippulige, S. & Ilavarasan, P. V. What is coming next in health technology startups? Some insights and practice guidelines. Digit. Health. 9, 20552076231178435 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chakraborty, I., Ilavarasan, P. V. & Edirippulige, S. Health-tech startups in healthcare service delivery: A scoping review. Soc. Sci. Med. 278, 113949 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lyu, Y., He, B., Zhu, Y. & Li, L. Network embeddedness and inbound open innovation practice: the moderating role of technology cluster. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 144, 12–24 (2019).
Google Scholar
Liu, X. et al. Coopetition, exploration and exploitation capabilities, and growth performance in digital healthcare ventures. Front. Public. Health. 12, 1369885 (2024).
Google Scholar
Monticelli, J. M., Verschoore, J. R. & Garrido, I. L. The emergence of coopetition in highly regulated industries: A study on the Brazilian private healthcare market. Ind. Mark. Manage. 108, 35–46 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dogbe, C. S. K., Tian, H., Pomegbe, W. W. K., Sarsah, S. A. & Otoo, C. O. A. Effect of network embeddedness on innovation performance of small and medium-sized enterprises: the moderating role of innovation openness. J. Strategy Manage. 13, 181–197 (2020).
Li, X. & Liu, X. The impact of the collaborative innovation network embeddedness on enterprise green innovation performance. Front. Environ. Sci. 11, 1190697 (2023).
Google Scholar
Huberty, J. & Beatty, C. C. Integrating science into digital health workflows: A strategic approach for leaders. Digit. Health. 10, 20552076241296572 (2024).
Google Scholar
Saragih, H. S. Ambicultural sensitivity and relational embeddedness in fostering B2B relationship. J. Bus. Industrial Mark. 39, 2123–2139 (2024).
Google Scholar
Letaifa, S. B. & Goglio-Primard, K. How does institutional context shape entrepreneurship conceptualizations? J. Bus. Res. 69, 5128–5134 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hara, Y. & Choi, Y. The roles of relational diversity and embeddedness in absorptive capacity enhancement. Ind. Mark. Manage. 125, 48–59 (2025).
Google Scholar
Trivedi, K. & Srivastava, K. B. The impact of intellectual capital-enhancing HR practices and culture on innovativeness—mediating role of knowledge management processes. J. Organizational Effectiveness: People Perform. 11, 573–593 (2024).
Google Scholar
Dedunu, H., Weerasinghe, S. & Wickcramasinghe, A. Reality is different from what we see: knowledge management and firm innovation. J. Innov. Knowl. 10, 100693 (2025).
Google Scholar
Su, H., Liang, Y. & Wen, T. Structural embeddedness, entrepreneurial behavior, and firm performance in the industry network of small tourism enterprises: the moderating role of relational embeddedness and leadership self-efficacy. J. Hospitality Tourism Manage. 56, 431–442 (2023).
Google Scholar
Swierczek, A. Developing relational embeddedness of logistics service provider to enhance supply chain performance in transitive triads. Int. J. Logistics Manage. 34, 1322–1351 (2023).
Google Scholar
Albis, N., Alvarez, I. & García, A. The impact of external, internal, and dual relational embeddedness on the innovation performance of foreign subsidiaries: evidence from a developing country. J. Int. Manag. 27, 100854 (2021).
Feng, B., Zheng, M. & Shen, Y. The effect of relational embeddedness on transparency in supply chain networks: the moderating role of digitalization. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 44, 1621–1648 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kumar, P., Nowinska, A. & Zaheer, A. The paradox of Spatial and relational embeddedness: tie reinitiation after a trust violation. Acad. Manag. J. 68, 81–107 (2025).
Google Scholar
Al-Atwi, A. A., Amankwah-Amoah, J. & Khan, Z. Micro-foundations of organizational design and sustainability: the mediating role of learning ambidexterity. Int. Bus. Rev. 30, 101656 (2021).
Google Scholar
Trivedi, K. & Singh, S. The impact of knowledge sharing on well-being at work – Is organizational learning capability a mediating link? The Learn. Organization (2025).
Jiang, S. et al. Strategic conformity, organizational learning ambidexterity, and corporate innovation performance: an inverted U-shaped curve? J. Bus. Res. 149, 424–433 (2022).
Google Scholar
Shao, Z., Li, X. & Wang, Q. From ambidextrous learning to digital creativity: an integrative theoretical framework. Inform. Syst. J. 32, 544–572 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wei, Z., Yi, Y. & Guo, H. Organizational learning ambidexterity, strategic flexibility, and new product development. J. Prod. Innov. Manage. 31, 832–847 (2014).
Google Scholar
Wu, T., Chen, B., Shao, Y. & Lu, H. Enable digital transformation: entrepreneurial leadership, ambidextrous learning and organisational performance. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 33, 1389–1403 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nevis, E. C., DiBella, A. J. & Gould, J. M. Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems (Routledge, 2009).
Bendig, D., Enke, S., Thieme, N. & Brettel, M. Performance implications of cross-functional coopetition in new product development: the mediating role of organizational learning. Ind. Mark. Manage. 73, 137–153 (2018a).
Google Scholar
Konopik, J. The impact of digital platforms and ecosystems in healthcare on value creation—a integrative review and research agenda. IEEE Access. 11, 135811–135819 (2023).
Google Scholar
Karanika-Murray, M., Whysall, Z., Liu-Smith, Y. L., Feltbower, C. & Challans-Rasool, E. Understanding organizational learning in a healthcare organization during sudden and disruptive change. Int. J. Workplace Health Manage. 16, 257–280 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lyman, B., Hammond, E. L. & Cox, J. R. Organisational learning in hospitals: A concept analysis. J. Nurs. Adm. Manag. 27, 633–646 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cresswell, K. et al. Interorganizational knowledge sharing to Establish digital health learning ecosystems: qualitative evaluation of a National digital health transformation program in England. J. Med. Internet. Res. 23, e23372 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lyman, B. & Moore, C. The learning history: A research method to advance the science and practice of organizational learning in healthcare. J. Adv. Nurs. 75, 472–481 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mikalef, P., Boura, M., Lekakos, G. & Krogstie, J. Big data analytics capabilities and innovation: the mediating role of dynamic capabilities and moderating effect of the environment. Br. J. Manag. 30, 272–298 (2019).
Google Scholar
Liu, J., Ning, L. & Gao, Q. Research on the knowledge transfer mechanism of digital platform in the digital innovation ecosystem: an improved model of SIR embedded in symbiosis theory. Kybernetes 54, 622–645 (2025).
Google Scholar
Crupi, A. et al. The digital transformation of SMEs–a new knowledge broker called the digital innovation hub. J. Knowl. Manage. 24, 1263–1288 (2020).
Google Scholar
Guo, L., Cui, Y., Wu, Y. & M, J. Research on the influence of relation embeddedness on innovation performance of manufacturing supply chain alliances using expert fuzzy rule–intermediary role of shared mental model. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 40, 8287–8294 (2021).
Li, D. Y. & Liu, J. Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: evidence from China. J. Bus. Res. 67, 2793–2799 (2014).
Google Scholar
Leone, D., Schiavone, F., Appio, F. P. & Chiao, B. How does artificial intelligence enable and enhance value co-creation in industrial markets? An exploratory case study in the healthcare ecosystem. J. Bus. Res. 129, 849–859 (2021).
Google Scholar
De Meulenaere, K., Kunze, F. & Bruch, H. Age–rank correlations and firm-level outcomes: the moderating role of environmental dynamism. J. Organizational Behav. 45, 1269–1286 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A. & Volberda, H. W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Manage. Sci. 52, 1661–1674 (2006).
Google Scholar
Osei-Frimpong, K., McLean, G., Wilson, A. & Lemke, F. Customer coproduction in healthcare service delivery: examining the influencing effects of the social context. J. Bus. Res. 120, 82–93 (2020).
Google Scholar
Polanyi, L. K. Humanity, Society, and Commitment: on Karl Polanyi (Black Rose, 1994).
Granovetter, M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91, 481–510 (1985).
Google Scholar
Moran, P. Structural vs. relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 26, 1129–1151 (2005).
Google Scholar
Gulati, R. Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strateg. Manag. J. 20, 397–420 (1999).
Google Scholar
Dezi, L., Ferraris, A., Papa, A. & Vrontis, D. The role of external embeddedness and knowledge management as antecedents of ambidexterity and performances in Italian SMEs. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 68, 360–369 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhao, H., Wang, G., Wang, M. & Zhang, B. Research on the influence mechanism of dual social network embeddedness combined ambidexterity on entrepreneurial performance of returning migrant workers. Entrepreneurship Res. J. 14, 1063–1096 (2024).
Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. Competitive strategy. Measuring Bus. Excellence. 1, 12–17 (1997).
Google Scholar
Uzzi, B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Adm. Sci. Q. 42, 35–67 (1997).
Google Scholar
Zhu, Y., Wang, V. L., Wang, Y. J. & Nastos, J. Business-to-business referral as digital coopetition strategy: insights from an industry-wise digital business network. Eur. J. Mark. 54, 1181–1203 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lee, M. J. & Roh, T. Unpacking the sustainable performance in the business ecosystem: coopetition strategy, open innovation, and digitalization capability. J. Clean. Prod. 412, 137433 (2023).
Google Scholar
Guo, R., Yin, H. & Liu, X. Coopetition, organizational agility, and innovation performance in digital new ventures. Ind. Mark. Manage. 111, 143–157 (2023).
Google Scholar
Xu, G., Liu, X., Zhou, Y. & Su, J. Effects of relational embeddedness on technological innovation: an empirical study in China. Chin. Manage. Stud. 6, 108–123 (2012).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Long, J. & Zhao, W. Building dynamic capabilities of small and medium-sized enterprises through relational embeddedness: evidence from China. Electron. Commer. Res. 23, 2859–2906 (2023a).
Google Scholar
Li, Y. & Fei, G. Z. Network embeddedness, digital transformation, and enterprise performance—The moderating effect of top managerial cognition. Front. Psychol. 14, 1098974 (2023).
Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. Birth of an organization: the economic Cooperation administration. Public Adm. Rev. 13, 227–236 (1953).
Google Scholar
Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reis 345–348 (1997).
Hult, G. T. M. & Ferrell, O. C. Global organizational learning capacity in purchasing: construct and measurement. J. Bus. Res. 40, 97–111 (1997).
Google Scholar
Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E. & Noordewier, T. A framework for market-based organizational learning: linking values, knowledge, and behavior. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 25, 305–318 (1997).
Google Scholar
Tippins, M. J. & Sohi, R. S. IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? Strateg. Manag. J. 24, 745–761 (2003).
Google Scholar
March, J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2, 71–87 (1991).
Google Scholar
Singh, N., Salwan, P., Kumar Mangla, S. & Vrontis, D. Impact of dimensions of absorptive capacity on multinationals’ reverse knowledge transfer: from an Indian context. J. Knowl. Manage. 29, 171–203 (2025).
Google Scholar
Ferreira, J., Coelho, A. & Moutinho, L. Strategic alliances, exploration and exploitation and their impact on innovation and new product development: the effect of knowledge sharing. Manag. Decis. 59, 524–567 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liang, H., Wang, N. & Xue, Y. Juggling information technology (IT) exploration and exploitation: A proportional balance view of IT ambidexterity. Inform. Syst. Res. 33, 1386–1402 (2022).
Google Scholar
Saeidi, P. et al. The impact of enterprise risk management on competitive advantage by moderating role of information technology. Comput. Stand. Interfaces. 63, 67–82 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. A. & Zeitz, G. J. Beyond survival: achieving new venture growth by Building legitimacy. Acad. Manage. Rev. 27, 414–431 (2002).
Google Scholar
Strese, S., Meuer, M. W., Flatten, T. C. & Brettel, M. Examining cross-functional coopetition as a driver of organizational ambidexterity. Ind. Mark. Manage. 57, 40–52 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Impact of the strategic role of IT on explorative and exploitative innovation activities: the role of environmental uncertainty. Decis. Sci. 51, 542–574 (2020).
Google Scholar
Schulze, A. & Dada, O. L. The effect of corporate venturing on knowledge acquisition and performance in small and medium-sized firms in Germany. J. Bus. Res. 188, 115080 (2025).
Google Scholar
Liao, S. H., Chen, C. C., Hu, D. C., Chung, Y. C. & Yang, M. J. Developing a sustainable competitive advantage: absorptive capacity, knowledge transfer and organizational learning. J. Technol. Transf. 42, 1431–1450 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhong, S. & Werner, C. The hidden strength of small business: social networks and wet market vendors in China. Economic Anthropol. 12, e12323 (2025).
Google Scholar
Wilson, J. & Tonner, A. Doing family: the constructed meanings of family in family farms. J. Rural Stud. 78, 245–253 (2020).
Google Scholar
Peng, H. & Yang, F. Research on the competitiveness and complementarity of agricultural trade between China and the association of Southeast Asian nations. Sustainability 16, 7046 (2024).
Google Scholar
Minniti, A. Growth, inter-industry and intra-industry competition and welfare. Japanese Economic Rev. 60, 110–132 (2009).
Google Scholar
Deligiannis, M., Liberopoulos, G. & Benioudakis, M. Dynamic supplier competition and Cooperation for buyer loyalty on service. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 255, 108706 (2023).
Google Scholar
Qu, J., Hu, B. & Meng, C. Joint innovation investment and pricing decisions in retail supply chains with customer value. Sustainability 13, 1309 (2021).
Google Scholar
Westra, D., Angeli, F., Carree, M. & Ruwaard, D. Coopetition in health care: A multi-level analysis of its individual and organizational determinants. Soc. Sci. Med. 186, 43–51 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Long, J. & Von Schaewen, A. M. E. How does digital transformation improve organizational resilience?—findings from PLS-SEM and FsQCA. Sustainability 13, 11487 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jiang, C. & Zhao, S. Does stage matter? The roles of organizational learning, social network, and corporate entrepreneurship in Chinese new ventures. Front. Bus. Res. China. 4, 362–392 (2010).
Bettis-Outland, H., Mora Cortez, R. & Johnston, W. J. Trade show networks, trust and organizational learning: the effect of network ties. J. Bus. Industrial Mark. 36, 2165–2175 (2021).
Google Scholar
Almahendra, R. Disentangling learning network dilemma: A Small-World effect in a globalized world. Sustainability 15, 2288 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gadille, M. & Gallego-Bono, J. R. Rebuilding a cluster while protecting knowledge within low-medium-tech supplier smes: A Spanish and French comparison. Sustainability 13, 11313 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ma, H. V., Liu, S., Klein, G., Huang, W. W. & Jiang, J. Social interdependencies as facilitators of cooperative learning in new product development: the moderating effect of technological novelty. Expert Syst. Appl. 195, 116619 (2022).
Google Scholar
Pu, M. & Soh, P. H. The role of dual embeddedness and organizational learning in subsidiary development. Asia Pac. J. Manage. 35, 373–397 (2018).
Google Scholar
Li, J., Cao, J. & Liu, Y. A study on the effects of dual network embeddedness on organizational learning and internationalization performance. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 13, 5519–5529 (2017).
Bendig, D., Strese, S., Flatten, T. C., da Costa, M. E. S. & Brettel, M. On micro-foundations of dynamic capabilities: A multi-level perspective based on CEO personality and knowledge-based capital. Long Range Plann. 51, 797–814 (2018b).
Google Scholar
Xie, X., Sun, J., Zhou, M., Yan, L. & Chi, M. Network embeddedness and manufacturing smes’ green innovation performance: the moderating role of resource orchestration capability. Bus. Process. Manage. J. 30, 884–908 (2024).
Google Scholar
Schilke, O. On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: the nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strateg. Manag. J. 35, 179–203 (2014).
Google Scholar
Coreynen, W., Matthyssens, P., Vanderstraeten, J. & van Witteloostuijn, A. Unravelling the internal and external drivers of digital servitization: A dynamic capabilities and contingency perspective on firm strategy. Ind. Mark. Manage. 89, 265–277 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ranjan, P. Unraveling the mystery of the link between digital orientation and innovation performance: the interplay of digital business capability and environmental dynamism. Technovation 131, 102966 (2024).
Google Scholar
Stratton, S. J. Purposeful sampling: advantages and pitfalls. Prehosp. Disaster Med. 39, 121–122 (2024).
Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. S. & Overton, T. S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Mark. Res. 14, 396–402 (1977).
Google Scholar
Gulati, R. & Sytch, M. Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer’s performance in procurement relationships. Adm. Sci. Q. 52, 32–69 (2007).
Google Scholar
Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103, 411 (1988).
Google Scholar
Dabbagh, A., Seens, H., Fraser, J. & MacDermid, J. C. Construct validity and internal consistency of the home and family work roles questionnaires: a cross-sectional study with exploratory factor analysis. BMC Women’s Health. 23, 56 (2023).
Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Struct. Equation Model. AMOS. 396, 227 (2010).
Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equation Modeling: Multidisciplinary J. 6, 1–55 (1999).
Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (Routledge, 2013).
Huang, P. H., Chen, H. & Weng, L. J. A penalized likelihood method for structural equation modeling. Psychometrika 82, 329–354 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lomax, R. G. A Beginner’s Guide To Structural Equation Modeling (Psychology, 2004).
Hair, J. F. et al. Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson New International Edition PDF eBook (Pearson Higher Ed, 2013).
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sinkovics, R. R. The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2009).
Malhotra, N. K., Schaller, T. K. & Patil, A. Common method variance in advertising research: when to be concerned and how to control for it. J. Advertising. 46, 193–212 (2017).
Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 879 (2003).
Google Scholar
Doty, D. H. & Glick, W. H. Common methods bias: does common methods variance really bias results? Organizational Res. Methods. 1, 374–406 (1998).
Google Scholar
Liu, C. H. S. & Lee, T. Service quality and price perception of service: influence on word-of-mouth and revisit intention. J. Air Transp. Manage. 52, 42–54 (2016).
Google Scholar
Tang, R. Digital economy and total factor productivity of tourism enterprises in china: the perspective of market competition theory. Curr. Issues Tourism. 27, 76–91 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mozumdar, L. et al. Embeddedness or over-embeddedness? Women entrepreneurs’ networks and their influence on business performance. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 31, 1449–1469 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Chu, Z., Ren, L. & Xing, J. Open innovation and sustainable competitive advantage: the role of organizational learning. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 186, 122114 (2023b).
Google Scholar
Temouri, Y., Shen, K., Pereira, V. & Xie, X. How do emerging market SMEs utilize resources in the face of environmental uncertainty? BRQ Bus. Res. Q. 25, 212–223 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yuen, K. F., Wang, X., Wong, Y. D. & Ma, F. A contingency view of the effects of sustainable shipping exploitation and exploration on business performance. Transp. Policy. 77, 90–103 (2019).
Google Scholar
Srikanth, K. & Ungureanu, T. Organizational adaptation in dynamic environments: disentangling the effects of how much to explore versus where to explore. Strateg. Manag. J. 46, 19–48 (2025).
Google Scholar
Gong, Y., Le, Y., Zhang, X., Chen, X. & Zeng, H. Organizational adaptability influenced by practice strategy, environmental dynamism, and absorptive capacity. Complexity. 4241485 (2021). (2021).
Posen, H. E. & Levinthal, D. A. Chasing a moving target: exploitation and exploration in dynamic environments. Manage. Sci. 58, 587–601 (2012).
Google Scholar
Li, W. & Wang, L. Strategic choices of exploration and exploitation alliances under market uncertainty. Manag. Decis. 57, 3112–3133 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kim, K., Seo, E. H. & Kim, C. Y. The relationships between environmental dynamism, absorptive capacity, organizational ambidexterity, and innovation performance from the dynamic capabilities perspective. Sustainability 17, 449 (2025).
Google Scholar
Lee, C. Y. & Huang, Y. C. Knowledge stock, ambidextrous learning, and firm performance: evidence from technologically intensive industries. Manag. Decis. 50, 1096–1116 (2012).
Google Scholar
Lin, Z., Yang, H. & Demirkan, I. The performance consequences of ambidexterity in strategic alliance formations: empirical investigation and computational theorizing. Manage. Sci. 53, 1645–1658 (2007).
Google Scholar
Bai, L., Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Shao, K. & Luo, X. Unlocking the potential of project portfolio: value-oriented interactive risk management. Humanit. Social Sci. Commun. 12, 1–15 (2025).
Google Scholar
Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E. & Zhang, H. Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organ. Sci. 20, 781–796 (2009).
Google Scholar
Wu, G. S. et al. The effect of relational embeddedness, absorptive capacity, and learning orientation on smes’ competitive advantage. Front. Psychol. 11, 1505 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zang, S., Wang, H. & Zhou, J. Impact of eco-embeddedness and strategic flexibility on innovation performance of non-core firms: the perspective of ecological legitimacy. J. Innov. Knowl. 7, 100266 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, J., Xu, N. & Xiao, Y. Network relationship embeddedness, ambidexterity innovation, and enterprise performance: empirical evidences from big private firms. IT Prof. 27, 90–97 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhou, Z., Wen, X. & Yang, F. Impact of network embeddedness on innovation performance: the perspective of organisational routine updating. Eur. J. Innov. Manage. 28, 1292–1314 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, A. & Zhang, W. The effects of relational embeddedness and network routines on Industry–University Cooperation in Chinese construction firms: the moderating role of intermediaries. Sci. Technol. Soc. 30, 343–362 (2025).
Google Scholar
Kou, Y. & Liu, K. Effects of dual organizational network embeddedness on safety resilience in construction projects. Engineering Constr. Architectural Management (2025).
Sun, S. et al. COVID-19 and healthcare system in china: challenges and progression for a sustainable future. Globalization Health. 17, 1–8 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cheng, T. C. & Yip, W. Policies, progress, and prospects for internet telemedicine in China. Health Syst. Reform. 10, 2389570 (2024).
Google Scholar
link